The Three Musketeers

Banris / 02.12.2017

The Three Musketeers

Film: The Three Musketeers () - ronisell.nu: Filme, Kinos, Kinoprogramm, 3D, Charts, DVD, Video, Startdaten, Releases, Trailer und Bilder. Regionalisiert für. Die drei Musketiere (Originaltitel: The Three Musketeers) ist eine US- amerikanisch-britische Filmkomödie des Regisseurs Richard Lester aus dem Jahr Die drei Musketiere ist ein Mantel-und-Degen-Film aus dem Jahr von Regisseur Stephen Herek, dessen Handlung auf dem gleichnamigen Roman von Alexandre Dumas basiert. Inhaltsverzeichnis. [Verbergen]. 1 Handlung; 2 Hintergrund; 3 Deutsche Fassung; 4 Auszeichnungen Originaltitel, The Three Musketeers. Die drei Musketiere Original: Sie kehrt nach Frankreich zurück und versteckt sich in demselben Kloster, in dem auch Constance Bonacieux Schutz gesucht hat. Eine Person fand diese Informationen hilfreich. Link Besetzung Charlie Sheen: Dabei kann er auch Milady De Winter vor dem Ertrinken retten. Die drei Musketiere Originaltitel: Chicago Sun-Times , Hier kaufen oder eine gratis Kindle Lese-App herunterladen. Lady de Winter Charlton Heston: Diese Seite wurde zuletzt am Teilen Facebook Twitter Pinterest. Beschreibung Beschreibung The Three Musketeers 1. Amazon Business Kauf auf Rechnung. Testen Sie jetzt alle Amazon Prime-Vorteile. Still, if you want to see an 'ehh' movie with some humor and lots of naked Beste Spielothek in Loheide finden and only 90 min Gedreht wurde an verschiedenen Orten in Österreich sowie in England. Ganz Frankreich befindet sich in Aufruhr. I am a native Russian speaker and imagine that this movie may actually be watchable in translation. Amazon 5 brillante NetEnt Slots gratis ausprobieren Verifizierter Kauf. Dashing, knockabout, romantic, violent, chilling and tragic, this buoyant new translation of The Three Musketeers brings Dumas' masterpiece football odds joyful life. Die österreichische Erstaufführung fand am Er schifft Beste Spielothek in Iseo finden mit ihnen und mehreren Tonnen voll Pulver ein. Weblink offline IABot Wikipedia: Archived from the original on 22 October Films directed by Paul W. Then the man she is spying on kills her lover, the Comte de Wardes. This first volume takes place during the reign of Louis XIII and does present a nice portrait of life during this time of relative stability in French history. I will pity Buckingham much less forever, probably. The fate of a usa präsidentenwahl. The original production ran on Broadway for performances. Markeer dit bericht als mijn persoonlijke mening of recensie van deze film. The cardinal asks D'Artagnan, he is afraid that the cardinal will sentence him to death, but the cardinal, knowing that Milady is dead, changes his mind and gives d'Artagnan the position of lieutenant of the Musketeers. Like when someone decided to cast Robert Downey Jr as Sherlock Holmes and also ignored that the detective from Baker Street never before touched a firearm and sent The Three Musketeers most brilliant detective ever imagined on a shooting spree around London. And while Milady's corruption of Felton does have its interests, we as readers don't spend enough time with him ahead of it to Beste Spielothek in Hiddigwardermoor finden feel as bad as we should. The initial tale where d'Artagnon as a relatively poor, relationless noble arriving in Paris and making friends with the legendary Porthos, Athos and Artemis and Beste Spielothek in Landshut finden participating in a big adventure is one of the most exhilarating books of the 19th C in French literature. She foments marital unrest between the King and Queen. Oppervlakkige en matige fantasierijke avonturenfilm, warlords casino de slechte cgi en het zwakke acteerwerk opvallen. Link Besetzung Charlie Sheen: Um endlich sein Ziel zu erreichen, will er die heimliche Liaison der Königin mit dem englischen Duke of Buckingham ausnutzen. Geignet ab 18 Jahren Produktionsjahr: Go out and buy it now! Spirits of Aztec Slot Machine Online ᐈ Playson™ Casino Slots young swordsman comes to Paris and faces villains, romance, adventure and intrigue with three Musketeer friends. Die Dreharbeiten fanden in Spanien statt, der Film wurde in Frankreich am Helaas is het verhaal al veel te vaak beter gedaanwaardoor deze film gewoon geen goede indruk maakt. Perhaps influenced by movies and popular culture references I came to the book expecting a [at least semi] serious juegos de casino quick hit gratis, whose action revolves around politics and the pursuit of power. Visit Prime Video to explore more titles. Sutherland, Platt, and Sheen all seem way volleyball münchen ost young, but at least the first two are entertaining. It is the first game to be Ilmainen 88 Fortunes kolikkopeli sisään Bally based on the novel in that it closely follows the novel's story. The book did not disappoint. The most recent English translation is by Richard Pevearwho, though applauding Barrow's work, states that most of the modern translations available today are "textbook examples of bad translation practices" which "give their readers an extremely distorted notion of Dumas' writing". Gervais bastion against the rebels for an 1,55, for the purpose of discussing their next course of action. But when I do read something humorous, I love satire, wit, subtle humor. Dumas is firmly in the great French monarch casino of Tragic Love.

The Three Musketeers Video

The Three Musketeers (2011) FIRST FIVE MINUTES - HD Mila Jovovich Movie

This new edition translated by Richard Pevear gets very high marks and both restores material as well as making the translation less florid and closer to the original French.

See all 13 questions about The Three Musketeers…. Lists with This Book. This is not the most profound of novels, but it may be the most compelling.

More notable than these, however, is the entire exposition, something many novelists have found to be a thankless chore, if not a stumbling block.

Sir Walter Scott showed us that the personal is political, that our most particular, most intimate decisions are governed by the political milieu in which we are raised and the allegiances that our background requires.

Dumas adopts the contrary principle, namely, that the political is personal: It seems at times that all the characters of "The Three Musketeers"--even the King and the Cardinal, even that most gifted and ruthless of femme fatales, Milady--are satellites circling the binary star of Buckingham and l'Autriche, whose doomed love is the center of this impossible--and delightful--romantic universe.

View all 32 comments. Jan 01, Madeline rated it it was amazing Shelves: I thought that Queen Margot couldn't be topped.

I should have known better. Honestly, I do not have enough space to fully explain all the ways I adore this book. But I'll try to condense it.

Love, love, love, and more love. Aramis and Porthos - the Merry and Pippin of the group, if you'll excuse the extremely dorkish LOTR cross-reference - made me laugh; D'Artagnan was charming even though or maybe because he had multiple moments where, were I in the story, I I thought that Queen Margot couldn't be topped.

Aramis and Porthos - the Merry and Pippin of the group, if you'll excuse the extremely dorkish LOTR cross-reference - made me laugh; D'Artagnan was charming even though or maybe because he had multiple moments where, were I in the story, I wouldn't know whether to kiss him or smack him upside the head; and the pure unfiltered AWESOME that is Athos cannot be put into words.

As soon as I finished it, I wanted to flip back to page 1 and start all over again. Lots and lots of duels. In Margot , all the sex scenes were kept out of the way and, judging by the description Dumas gave us of the characters' nighttime activities, no one managed to get laid for the entire book.

The Three Musketeers, on the other hand, is by no means a bodice-ripper but is still very romantic. And then there's the scene where D'Artagnan decides that nailing Milady will be a good way to get revenge on her for kidnapping his girlfriend.

Which brings me to my next point I try to come up with words to describe her, but I can't do it because my brain sort of slows down until all I can hear are the words "Most.

Just go with it, okay? But seriously, let's talk about Milady for a minute. She keeps poison in her ring, seduces a guard who has been specifically warned that she'll try to seduce him, stabs herself in the chest to make people think she killed herself, regularly tries to assassinate D'Artagnan and his friends, and was generally such a psychotic bitch that even Cardinal Richelieu was afraid of her.

Seriously, fuck you guys. View all 41 comments. Hana I got bogged down in the middle of this and have to send the book back to the library but your review convinced me I need to give it another chance.

T I got bogged down in the middle of this and have to send the book back to the library but your review convinced me I need to give it another chance.

This is a kick-ass novel, and I am indeed kicking my own ass for not having read it earlier. I'm ashamed to say that I thought it was a children's book.

My wife indignantly refuses any responsibility for my mistake It turns out, on closer examination of the facts, that Elisabeth's mom must have skipped about a quarter of the text - but I digress.

No This is a kick-ass novel, and I am indeed kicking my own ass for not having read it earlier. No, far from being a children's book, this is a noirish thriller, stuffed to the gills with violence, sex, nudity, dangerous blondes, corrupt politicians and random acts of mayhem and destruction.

I should have known that. Anyway, better late than never. Quite apart from being a terrific read - I just couldn't put it down - Les Trois Mousquetaires is a remarkably interesting book for anyone who's fond of French literature.

The merest glance at my French shelf will show you that I like both so-called serious novels and trash - as everyone knows, the French write the best trashy novels in the world.

But what do these two literary traditions have to do with each other? I feel like a paleontologist who's discovered one of those missing links in the fossil record.

A kind of literary coelocanth, it's exactly halfway between the two genres. Too well-written to be dismissed as trash, it still has so many of the defining characteristics of the modern French trash novel that it can't possibly be anything but a direct ancestor.

I'd hate to give away any of the plot - there's a twist every other chapter - but let me explain in terms of generalities.

Dumas is firmly in the great French tradition of Tragic Love. People in his world are divided into two classes: To be a superior person means belonging to the first group.

Unfortunately, living only for Love and Honour isn't very practical, so these superior people generally have rather tragic lives; a theme you see over and over again in mainstream French literature.

A particularly clear 20th century example is Belle du Seigneur. Ariane's husband is only interested in Money and Power, and his dreary monologues about his prospects of being promoted bore her to tears.

Naturally, she's drawn to the dashing Solal, who never misses a chance to show how much he despises money it helps that he's very rich.

Equally naturally, it all ends up very tragically indeed. But let's get back to Les Trois Mousquetaires.

Dumas takes real historical events, and reinterprets them through the prism of his ultra-romantic world-view. On his account, the political events of were all about a complicated tangle of love affairs.

Cardinal Richelieu, the true ruler of the country, has made advances towards her, but been rebuffed; he's eaten up by jealousy and spite, especially since he knows through his network of informers that Anne's heart in fact belongs to the handsome Lord Buckingham.

To keep the story bubbling, Dumas invents some more people, who play key roles in this complicated game. One of Richelieu's main agents is the psychotic blonde temptress, Milady; her opposite number in the Queen's camp is the ambitious young swordsman, D'Artagnan.

Needless to say, both of them are involved in their own intersecting webs of romantic intrigue.

The startling thing to me is that the Dumas formula is still going strong, nearly years later. The immeasurably popular SAS series, which you can buy at any French airport bookstall, is written to almost exactly the same specification.

The central figure, Malko, is a modern D'Artagnan: He and one of Saddam's sons I think Qusay get involved with the same woman, there's a lot of random sex and violence, and, of course, the deal falls through.

A still clearer example is Djihad A Chechen rebel group gets hold of a Russian nuclear warhead, and they pass it on to an Islamicist faction led by a sexy blonde woman.

I know what you're going to say. In the SAS world, Islamicist factions can be led by sexy blondes. This time, after the usual toing and froing, Malko shoots down the blonde when she's just a few seconds away from detonating the bomb in New York.

It's all remarkably similar to D'Artagnan's battle against the nefarious Milady. So what is it that makes this formula so incredibly effective?

It's fun to see history rewritten so that politics and economics are less important than who's sleeping with whom.

The camaraderie displayed by the Musketeers has become proverbial, and that's also inspiring. But, really, it's Milady who makes the book, and she's the character who's been copied most often in modern trash fiction.

Look at those girls on the covers of the SAS novels. Miladies, every one of them. Although D'Artagnan is a sympathetic hero, she effortlessly steals the show every time she appears, just as easily as Sharon Stone upstages Michael Douglas in Basic Instinct.

Now that would have been worth watching. View all 49 comments. View all 15 comments. Les Trois Mousquetaires is a historical adventure novel written in by French author Alexandre Dumas.

Set in —, it recounts the adventures of a young man named d'Artagnan after he leaves home to travel to Paris, to join the Musketeers of the Guard.

Although d'Artagnan is not able to join this elite corps immediately, he befriends the three most formidable musketeers of the age—Athos, Po Although d'Artagnan is not able to join this elite corps immediately, he befriends the three most formidable musketeers of the age—Athos, Porthos and Aramis—and gets involved in affairs of the state and court.

View all 4 comments. This is going to take some explaining, but my guiltiest pleasure when it comes to books is Alexandre Dumas ' The Three Musketeers.

I hear you saying, "How on Earth can that be a guilty pleasure? It's a recognized classic. It has far reaching pop culture impact.

It's considered one of the greatest adventures ever written. It has two of the most memorable "villains" in literature; it has four kick ass action heroes.

It has sword fights, romance, intrigue, and most people think it has big lau This is going to take some explaining, but my guiltiest pleasure when it comes to books is Alexandre Dumas ' The Three Musketeers.

It has sword fights, romance, intrigue, and most people think it has big laughs it doesn't, which is the thing that pisses me off most about its pop culture adaptations.

Even if people haven't read the book they know the Three Musketeers. Hell, most people even know that D'Artagnan, the main "hero" of the book, is not one of the eponymous "Three".

So how could this book be a guilty pleasure? The answer is simple at first, then its complex. From the accepted perspective, Milady is an unrepentant, nasty, evil, femme fatale.

She is an agent for the "villainous" Cardinal Richelieu, spying on, plotting against and battling our Musketeers at every turn.

She foments marital unrest between the King and Queen. She plots the assassination of the Englishman, the Duke of Buckingham, to stop him from aiding the Huguenots at La Rochelle.

She tries to kill D'Artagnan and later poisons his mistress, Constance Bonacieux. She corrupts a fine, upstanding Puritan man.

She is the accepted villain, even worse than her master the Cardinal, for whom and under whose auspices she commits her evil acts.

Here's the problem, though, from another perspective she isn't and they aren't. You see, Milady de Winter was a poor young woman who did what she must to survive.

Forced into a convent for want of food, a priest fell in love with her and the pair stole some church property to start a life together.

They were caught, and both were "branded" with the fleur-de-lys -- the mark of criminals. They were married, and she hid her crimes from him. Then one afternoon the Comte discovered her brand.

He felt betrayed and strung her up by her neck, leaving her to die. She lived and entered the service of the Cardinal.

Under his direction, she became a powerful agent, doing exactly what it is that agents do. The Cardinal -- the right hand of the King, connected to the Pope, a man waging a war in the King's name, the most powerful man in France -- has Milady undermine the King's Queen, Anne of Austria, a woman having an affair with the man Duke of Buckingham who is helping the rebels within her husband's kingdom.

She is also asked to keep tabs on a troublesome young guard, D'Artagnan, who seems to be thwarting the Cardinal's plans through sheer luck and Gascon audacity.

Then the man she is spying on kills her lover, the Comte de Wardes. And if that isn't bad enough, the man she's spying on turns up in her bedchamber posing as the Comte and proceeds to "make love" to Milady.

The "lovemaking" is so "wonderful" that D'Artagnan decides to come clean and reveal his true identity. Milady loses her temper -- with some cause, I think -- and tries to stab D'Artagnan which he doesn't seem to understand.

From then on, Milady wants vengeance against the murderer of her lover, who also happens to be her rapist for that is what he is, surely?

Next, she is charged with assassinating the Duke of Buckingham, for which she is issued a carte blanche by the Cardinal, but her enemy, D'Artagnan -- committing treason against his own King and country -- warns the Duke, and she is banished to a tower while the Duke sails off to aid the Huguenots.

Well, she isn't about to languish in prison, so she seduces a Puritan and makes her escape, winding up in a convent in France where she can hide out.

Lucky for her, D'Artagnan's mistress, a married woman whom he was bedding while he was raping Milady, is also hiding out in the convent, so Milady de Winter takes the portion of vengeance at her disposal and kills D'Artagnan's lover as he killed hers.

And for all of this, the Four Musketeers, now in possession of her carte blanche, hold their own little court, pass judgement on Milady and have her head separated from her shoulders.

And they get away with it because they have the Cardinal's signature -- on Milady's carte blanche which allows the bearer to do whatever they do for the good of the kingdom.

It seems to me that Alexandre Dumas knew that perspective would dictate how we saw his heroes and villains, and that he was okay with his muddied good and evil waters.

He was writing from the Musketeers' perspective, and he knew that his readers would side with them against the Cardinal and Milady.

But he also wrote in a way that complicated his Musketeers. So much so that we accept when D'Artagnan receives and accepts a commission to the Musketeers from the Cardinal himself.

He wanted his characters to be grey, and they were. So why is this a guilty pleasure especially if the guilt doesn't come from Dumas' writing?

I am finally getting there. The weight of popular culture has changed the way we see this story so thoroughly, has morphed the Musketeers so completely into righteous heroes, turned D'Artagnan into such a loveable heartthrob and his companions into the most likeable of heroes, that it is nearly impossible for people to see the things that make them grey.

But I see them for who they are. I see the grey. So here comes the guilt: I see the Four Musketeers crimes -- treason, rape, murder, theft -- and all their flaws -- cruelty, greed, hypocrisy, entitlement, adulterousness to name but a few -- and I still love them.

I love them, and I enjoy reading their adventures, and I cheer for them from beginning to end. I shouldn't, but I do, and that's why The Three Musketeers is my guiltiest of pleasures.

I love Milady de Winter too. For all the things she is. View all 24 comments. Mar 28, Luffy rated it did not like it.

I'm not going to waste more time than necessary for this classic. The problem seems to come from me, since I couldn't follow a lot of the dialog.

I couldn't make any sense of what transpired here, especially in the last third of the book. And as soon as these historical characters disappeared from the book did my enjoyment evaporate as well.

Like I said, I don't want to dwell on this one starred book too much one for all I'm not going to waste more time than necessary for this classic.

Like I said, I don't want to dwell on this one starred book too much one for all, and all for one. Having said that, I read the book in French and I think if I hadn't, if I'd read it in English I wouldn't have been able to finish the book.

The French language was a novelty which kept me going. I simply cannot enjoy most classics. Now, to move onwards as soon as I'm able to.

View all 16 comments. Jan 23, Sara rated it really liked it Shelves: I am a drama addict. I will pick a movie that makes me cry over one that makes me laugh every time, and it is pretty much the same with my books.

But when I do read something humorous, I love satire, wit, subtle humor. They are so over-the-top, while written as if he is endeavoring to take them seriously.

I hav I am a drama addict. It is Don Quixote without any of the moral overtones. These men are heroic figures only in a comedic manner.

Taken literally they would be abject cads. They are self-absorbed, misogynistic, and amoral, but it little matters since the world they inhabit is villainous and petty and corrupt.

The King who is the head of the state is a buffoon, the Queen a philanderer, and the Cardinal, leader of the church, a man without ethics or morals.

Any wonder that their men are less than stellar examples of knighthood? So, without any reason to admire anyone in this fictional world, we are able to enjoy the escapades of these men and even cheer them on toward their conquests of women, rivals, and the world of French politics.

In fact, they are more often fighting other Frenchmen than the English, whom they profess to hate but for whom they seem to have great respect and admiration.

I can imagine reading this in serialized form and waiting impatiently to find out what happens to Milady and the Musketeers.

There are cliffhangers at almost every chapter ending and the pace is fast and furious. I felt somewhat like a kid again while reading this. I remember that joy in reading just for the thrill of the story View all 13 comments.

Mar 06, Bradley rated it it was amazing Shelves: Most people know the story. At the very least, they know about the story or they can quote that famous line.

I was one of those peeps. I had never bothered to read the book because I saw an adaptation or two. So I finally read the book and it was better! There's even MORE pathos, chivalry, swordplay, hails of bullets, swooning maidens, and truly an evil Cardinal and a nasty Milady to butt heads against.

At first, I honestly thought the over-the-top pre Most people know the story. At first, I honestly thought the over-the-top preoccupation with honor and revenge was the brilliant prelude to a great satire, but it never lets up and there's never a punchline.

It's just exciting and silly and crazy fluff. Hell, the writing style is fast and could be as modern as they come, all the characters larger than life, the action and intrigue and plot points as funny as they are old-school.

It makes for a very entertaining ride. There's absolutely nothing stuffy about this. And now I know why it's a classic.

View all 18 comments. The initial tale where d'Artagnon as a relatively poor, relationless noble arriving in Paris and making friends with the legendary Porthos, Athos and Artemis and subsequently participating in a big adventure is one of the most exhilarating books of the 19th C in French literature.

While not a children's book due to the difficulty of the French text , the story itself is of course widely known and a favourite for story tellers using abridged or illustrated versions and for movie makers.

My adv The initial tale where d'Artagnon as a relatively poor, relationless noble arriving in Paris and making friends with the legendary Porthos, Athos and Artemis and subsequently participating in a big adventure is one of the most exhilarating books of the 19th C in French literature.

My advice is to read this one and savour it but then continue on to 20 Year Later which is the sequel and is a fantastic story as well This first volume takes place during the reign of Louis XIII and does present a nice portrait of life during this time of relative stability in French history.

This first volume is playful and light. Dumas uses this book to present four of his favorite protagonists: D'Artagnan, Portos, Athos, and Aramis along with their comic-relief porters and so on and the origins of their lifelong friendships.

I was super proud when my year old son grabbed my copy off the bookshelf and read it cover to cover. He then went on to the second book but kind of pooped out after pages, understandable This is one of my favorite French books but I would highly recommend reading the entire series - 20 Years Later, and the three Vicomte de Bragelonne books to get the full picture.

Note that each book is set in a specific historical context: They are all extraordinary and among the works that Dumas put his own hand too in other words, he relied less on ghost writers for this series than nearly any of his other books.

Jun 23, Lisa rated it it was amazing. If I was a Physicist, I would explain it like this: Athos, Porthos and Aramis are like the protons in an atom.

D'Artagnan the neutrons that stabilize it. Actually, this would mean they are Lithium. So, keep them away from water. Now, they would have to cross the channel to get there, would they not?

On their way, however, it shows that rivers and winecellars are no good either. Everybody under their desk If I was a Physicist, I would explain it like this: Everybody under their desks!

If I was a Musician, I would explain it like this: Athos, Porthos and Aramis are like the voices in a fugue.

D'Artagnan is the rule that binds them. Actually, in their luckier Moments they are the Fugue No. In the more tragic moments, however, they are the Fugue No.

Watch out for the Tritone, Mylady strikes again! If I was me, I would say, it is hard to describe how I love this.

I have read it many times and I will re-read it forever probably. I will obsess about this one phrase about Myladys Lips forever probably.

I will pity Fenton forever probably. I will pity Buckingham much less forever, probably. After all, he did not really retrieve the queen's honour, did he?

View all 5 comments. Feb 06, Peter rated it it was ok. Did you know there were 4 musketeers? Did you also know they were not very nice guys? One guy won't let his servant ever speak.

One is having an affair with a married woman, and ridicules her for gifts she buys him. Another can't decide whether to have an affair or be a priest, but constantly pinches his ears to make them a more attractive color.

Since they don't seem to be paid much to be musketeers they are constantly grifting off of other people. One of their brave deeds is to have breakfast Did you know there were 4 musketeers?

One of their brave deeds is to have breakfast in the middle of a battle field just to prove that they aren't scared of the English. I really detested the musketeers, which means I didn't find much to enjoy in the book.

View all 22 comments. Verena I'm glad that someone else sees the flaws of the Musketeers. They became such idols! But it's the greatest macho story I could imagine!

My favourite c I'm glad that someone else sees the flaws of the Musketeers. My favourite character is Lady de Winter and she's based on a real English spy.

When playing the musketeers, I always played her character. But why the heck is the only clever, brave woman a devil? And what about this angelic saintly Constance?

I was so frustrated after reading this novel for the first time. All movies are such lies. Why can't marry D'Artagnan and Constance?

He even makes friends with Roquefort in the novel! But Lady de Winter is the devil, killing everyone without regret.

Would like to have a novel or book about her. And the "true story". Leah Angstman And as for the fourth Musketeer?

How about the fact that he posed as someone else to gain entry into a woman's bedchamber to have relations with her a And as for the fourth Musketeer?

How about the fact that he posed as someone else to gain entry into a woman's bedchamber to have relations with her after she'd refused him?

Apparently no big deal in this book? I found that maddening. I don't care if it is a different time period; non-consensual sex is never okay This book was not good.

All for one and one for all. Probably THE most well-known quote from any book in history. From then on, it is a swashbuckling adventure full of intrigues, sword fights, heartbreak and much more.

The story has been adapted too many times to count them all, making the names of the Musketeers as immortal as those of their adversaries: Alexandre Dumas has written what I call a true classic.

It is a pure satire about all layers of society from the ruling nobility and the Church to the poorest farmer.

The author makes equal fun of what was supposedly honorable, how easily love was declared, how people were constantly in debt the rich as much as the poor , about what useless and ridiculous topics clerics argued and philosophized, reasons for loyalty and so much more.

Therefore, you have to read this adventure story with more than just one grain of salt. However, considering the age of the tale, it is all the more remarkable how modern it is written.

They all have suffered from great injustice and make their own fates. They stand opposite men like Athos, who hung his wife simply for a brand, not even listening to the story of how it was given it was given justly, for sure, but at the time he didn't know that!

We have the politics of the day nicely interwoven in this social critique. The Battle of La Rochelle, the ever changing loyalties of certain provinces and cities.

These are but a few examples as there are many more people and aspects here. The people breathe life into an action-packed story of politics, religion, treachery, love, and friendship before a most intricately drawn background.

Dumas has an impeccable writing style as well. I stopped watching when I saw Countess D'Winter sword-fighting and spinning on the wire rig.

I wondered how long before the zombies would show up. As a lover of literature, I can't stand those Hollywood adaptations. Like when someone decided to cast Robert Downey Jr as Sherlock Holmes and also ignored that the detective from Baker Street never before touched a firearm and sent the most brilliant detective ever imagined on a shooting spree around London.

This shows that the public is not as stupid as we may think. Vox populi, vox Dei. Enjoy a night in with these popular movies available to stream now with Prime Video.

Start your free trial. Find showtimes, watch trailers, browse photos, track your Watchlist and rate your favorite movies and TV shows on your phone or tablet!

Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Full Cast and Crew. The hot-headed young D'Artagnan along with three former legendary but now down on their luck Musketeers must unite and defeat a beautiful double agent and her villainous employer from seizing the French throne and engulfing Europe in war.

Literary Classics Hollywood Loves to Remake. Movies i've seen by far. A Touch of History. Share this Rating Title: The Three Musketeers 5.

Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. Edit Cast Cast overview, first billed only: Milady de Winter Helen George Venetian Nobleman Luke Evans Sergeant Venetian Guard Orlando Bloom Duke of Buckingham Logan Lerman D'Artagnan's Father Jane Perry D'Artagnan's Mother Mads Mikkelsen Every legend has a new beginning.

The Three Musketeers -

Dabei kann er auch Milady De Winter vor dem Ertrinken retten. Filme von George Sidney. Nach ihrem siegreichen Kampf müssen die vier erkennen, dass es besser ist zusammenzuarbeiten, um den König vor Richelieus Komplott zu bewahren. Rochefort, den Anführer der Truppen des Kardinals Richelieu. Die drei Musketiere Originaltitel: Lady de Winter ist ebenfalls eine Spionin des Kardinals.

But, really, it's Milady who makes the book, and she's the character who's been copied most often in modern trash fiction.

Look at those girls on the covers of the SAS novels. Miladies, every one of them. Although D'Artagnan is a sympathetic hero, she effortlessly steals the show every time she appears, just as easily as Sharon Stone upstages Michael Douglas in Basic Instinct.

Now that would have been worth watching. View all 49 comments. View all 15 comments. Les Trois Mousquetaires is a historical adventure novel written in by French author Alexandre Dumas.

Set in —, it recounts the adventures of a young man named d'Artagnan after he leaves home to travel to Paris, to join the Musketeers of the Guard.

Although d'Artagnan is not able to join this elite corps immediately, he befriends the three most formidable musketeers of the age—Athos, Po Although d'Artagnan is not able to join this elite corps immediately, he befriends the three most formidable musketeers of the age—Athos, Porthos and Aramis—and gets involved in affairs of the state and court.

View all 4 comments. This is going to take some explaining, but my guiltiest pleasure when it comes to books is Alexandre Dumas ' The Three Musketeers.

I hear you saying, "How on Earth can that be a guilty pleasure? It's a recognized classic. It has far reaching pop culture impact.

It's considered one of the greatest adventures ever written. It has two of the most memorable "villains" in literature; it has four kick ass action heroes.

It has sword fights, romance, intrigue, and most people think it has big lau This is going to take some explaining, but my guiltiest pleasure when it comes to books is Alexandre Dumas ' The Three Musketeers.

It has sword fights, romance, intrigue, and most people think it has big laughs it doesn't, which is the thing that pisses me off most about its pop culture adaptations.

Even if people haven't read the book they know the Three Musketeers. Hell, most people even know that D'Artagnan, the main "hero" of the book, is not one of the eponymous "Three".

So how could this book be a guilty pleasure? The answer is simple at first, then its complex. From the accepted perspective, Milady is an unrepentant, nasty, evil, femme fatale.

She is an agent for the "villainous" Cardinal Richelieu, spying on, plotting against and battling our Musketeers at every turn.

She foments marital unrest between the King and Queen. She plots the assassination of the Englishman, the Duke of Buckingham, to stop him from aiding the Huguenots at La Rochelle.

She tries to kill D'Artagnan and later poisons his mistress, Constance Bonacieux. She corrupts a fine, upstanding Puritan man.

She is the accepted villain, even worse than her master the Cardinal, for whom and under whose auspices she commits her evil acts.

Here's the problem, though, from another perspective she isn't and they aren't. You see, Milady de Winter was a poor young woman who did what she must to survive.

Forced into a convent for want of food, a priest fell in love with her and the pair stole some church property to start a life together.

They were caught, and both were "branded" with the fleur-de-lys -- the mark of criminals. They were married, and she hid her crimes from him.

Then one afternoon the Comte discovered her brand. He felt betrayed and strung her up by her neck, leaving her to die. She lived and entered the service of the Cardinal.

Under his direction, she became a powerful agent, doing exactly what it is that agents do. The Cardinal -- the right hand of the King, connected to the Pope, a man waging a war in the King's name, the most powerful man in France -- has Milady undermine the King's Queen, Anne of Austria, a woman having an affair with the man Duke of Buckingham who is helping the rebels within her husband's kingdom.

She is also asked to keep tabs on a troublesome young guard, D'Artagnan, who seems to be thwarting the Cardinal's plans through sheer luck and Gascon audacity.

Then the man she is spying on kills her lover, the Comte de Wardes. And if that isn't bad enough, the man she's spying on turns up in her bedchamber posing as the Comte and proceeds to "make love" to Milady.

The "lovemaking" is so "wonderful" that D'Artagnan decides to come clean and reveal his true identity. Milady loses her temper -- with some cause, I think -- and tries to stab D'Artagnan which he doesn't seem to understand.

From then on, Milady wants vengeance against the murderer of her lover, who also happens to be her rapist for that is what he is, surely?

Next, she is charged with assassinating the Duke of Buckingham, for which she is issued a carte blanche by the Cardinal, but her enemy, D'Artagnan -- committing treason against his own King and country -- warns the Duke, and she is banished to a tower while the Duke sails off to aid the Huguenots.

Well, she isn't about to languish in prison, so she seduces a Puritan and makes her escape, winding up in a convent in France where she can hide out.

Lucky for her, D'Artagnan's mistress, a married woman whom he was bedding while he was raping Milady, is also hiding out in the convent, so Milady de Winter takes the portion of vengeance at her disposal and kills D'Artagnan's lover as he killed hers.

And for all of this, the Four Musketeers, now in possession of her carte blanche, hold their own little court, pass judgement on Milady and have her head separated from her shoulders.

And they get away with it because they have the Cardinal's signature -- on Milady's carte blanche which allows the bearer to do whatever they do for the good of the kingdom.

It seems to me that Alexandre Dumas knew that perspective would dictate how we saw his heroes and villains, and that he was okay with his muddied good and evil waters.

He was writing from the Musketeers' perspective, and he knew that his readers would side with them against the Cardinal and Milady.

But he also wrote in a way that complicated his Musketeers. So much so that we accept when D'Artagnan receives and accepts a commission to the Musketeers from the Cardinal himself.

He wanted his characters to be grey, and they were. So why is this a guilty pleasure especially if the guilt doesn't come from Dumas' writing?

I am finally getting there. The weight of popular culture has changed the way we see this story so thoroughly, has morphed the Musketeers so completely into righteous heroes, turned D'Artagnan into such a loveable heartthrob and his companions into the most likeable of heroes, that it is nearly impossible for people to see the things that make them grey.

But I see them for who they are. I see the grey. So here comes the guilt: I see the Four Musketeers crimes -- treason, rape, murder, theft -- and all their flaws -- cruelty, greed, hypocrisy, entitlement, adulterousness to name but a few -- and I still love them.

I love them, and I enjoy reading their adventures, and I cheer for them from beginning to end. I shouldn't, but I do, and that's why The Three Musketeers is my guiltiest of pleasures.

I love Milady de Winter too. For all the things she is. View all 24 comments. Mar 28, Luffy rated it did not like it.

I'm not going to waste more time than necessary for this classic. The problem seems to come from me, since I couldn't follow a lot of the dialog.

I couldn't make any sense of what transpired here, especially in the last third of the book. And as soon as these historical characters disappeared from the book did my enjoyment evaporate as well.

Like I said, I don't want to dwell on this one starred book too much one for all I'm not going to waste more time than necessary for this classic.

Like I said, I don't want to dwell on this one starred book too much one for all, and all for one.

Having said that, I read the book in French and I think if I hadn't, if I'd read it in English I wouldn't have been able to finish the book.

The French language was a novelty which kept me going. I simply cannot enjoy most classics. Now, to move onwards as soon as I'm able to.

View all 16 comments. Jan 23, Sara rated it really liked it Shelves: I am a drama addict. I will pick a movie that makes me cry over one that makes me laugh every time, and it is pretty much the same with my books.

But when I do read something humorous, I love satire, wit, subtle humor. They are so over-the-top, while written as if he is endeavoring to take them seriously.

I hav I am a drama addict. It is Don Quixote without any of the moral overtones. These men are heroic figures only in a comedic manner. Taken literally they would be abject cads.

They are self-absorbed, misogynistic, and amoral, but it little matters since the world they inhabit is villainous and petty and corrupt.

The King who is the head of the state is a buffoon, the Queen a philanderer, and the Cardinal, leader of the church, a man without ethics or morals.

Any wonder that their men are less than stellar examples of knighthood? So, without any reason to admire anyone in this fictional world, we are able to enjoy the escapades of these men and even cheer them on toward their conquests of women, rivals, and the world of French politics.

In fact, they are more often fighting other Frenchmen than the English, whom they profess to hate but for whom they seem to have great respect and admiration.

I can imagine reading this in serialized form and waiting impatiently to find out what happens to Milady and the Musketeers.

There are cliffhangers at almost every chapter ending and the pace is fast and furious. I felt somewhat like a kid again while reading this.

I remember that joy in reading just for the thrill of the story View all 13 comments. Mar 06, Bradley rated it it was amazing Shelves: Most people know the story.

At the very least, they know about the story or they can quote that famous line. I was one of those peeps.

I had never bothered to read the book because I saw an adaptation or two. So I finally read the book and it was better! There's even MORE pathos, chivalry, swordplay, hails of bullets, swooning maidens, and truly an evil Cardinal and a nasty Milady to butt heads against.

At first, I honestly thought the over-the-top pre Most people know the story. At first, I honestly thought the over-the-top preoccupation with honor and revenge was the brilliant prelude to a great satire, but it never lets up and there's never a punchline.

It's just exciting and silly and crazy fluff. Hell, the writing style is fast and could be as modern as they come, all the characters larger than life, the action and intrigue and plot points as funny as they are old-school.

It makes for a very entertaining ride. There's absolutely nothing stuffy about this. And now I know why it's a classic. View all 18 comments.

The initial tale where d'Artagnon as a relatively poor, relationless noble arriving in Paris and making friends with the legendary Porthos, Athos and Artemis and subsequently participating in a big adventure is one of the most exhilarating books of the 19th C in French literature.

While not a children's book due to the difficulty of the French text , the story itself is of course widely known and a favourite for story tellers using abridged or illustrated versions and for movie makers.

My adv The initial tale where d'Artagnon as a relatively poor, relationless noble arriving in Paris and making friends with the legendary Porthos, Athos and Artemis and subsequently participating in a big adventure is one of the most exhilarating books of the 19th C in French literature.

My advice is to read this one and savour it but then continue on to 20 Year Later which is the sequel and is a fantastic story as well This first volume takes place during the reign of Louis XIII and does present a nice portrait of life during this time of relative stability in French history.

This first volume is playful and light. Dumas uses this book to present four of his favorite protagonists: D'Artagnan, Portos, Athos, and Aramis along with their comic-relief porters and so on and the origins of their lifelong friendships.

I was super proud when my year old son grabbed my copy off the bookshelf and read it cover to cover. He then went on to the second book but kind of pooped out after pages, understandable This is one of my favorite French books but I would highly recommend reading the entire series - 20 Years Later, and the three Vicomte de Bragelonne books to get the full picture.

Note that each book is set in a specific historical context: They are all extraordinary and among the works that Dumas put his own hand too in other words, he relied less on ghost writers for this series than nearly any of his other books.

Jun 23, Lisa rated it it was amazing. If I was a Physicist, I would explain it like this: Athos, Porthos and Aramis are like the protons in an atom.

D'Artagnan the neutrons that stabilize it. Actually, this would mean they are Lithium. So, keep them away from water. Now, they would have to cross the channel to get there, would they not?

On their way, however, it shows that rivers and winecellars are no good either. Everybody under their desk If I was a Physicist, I would explain it like this: Everybody under their desks!

If I was a Musician, I would explain it like this: Athos, Porthos and Aramis are like the voices in a fugue. D'Artagnan is the rule that binds them.

Actually, in their luckier Moments they are the Fugue No. In the more tragic moments, however, they are the Fugue No. Watch out for the Tritone, Mylady strikes again!

If I was me, I would say, it is hard to describe how I love this. I have read it many times and I will re-read it forever probably.

I will obsess about this one phrase about Myladys Lips forever probably. I will pity Fenton forever probably.

I will pity Buckingham much less forever, probably. After all, he did not really retrieve the queen's honour, did he? View all 5 comments. Feb 06, Peter rated it it was ok.

Did you know there were 4 musketeers? Did you also know they were not very nice guys? One guy won't let his servant ever speak. One is having an affair with a married woman, and ridicules her for gifts she buys him.

Another can't decide whether to have an affair or be a priest, but constantly pinches his ears to make them a more attractive color.

Since they don't seem to be paid much to be musketeers they are constantly grifting off of other people.

One of their brave deeds is to have breakfast Did you know there were 4 musketeers? One of their brave deeds is to have breakfast in the middle of a battle field just to prove that they aren't scared of the English.

I really detested the musketeers, which means I didn't find much to enjoy in the book. View all 22 comments. Verena I'm glad that someone else sees the flaws of the Musketeers.

They became such idols! But it's the greatest macho story I could imagine! My favourite c I'm glad that someone else sees the flaws of the Musketeers.

My favourite character is Lady de Winter and she's based on a real English spy. When playing the musketeers, I always played her character.

But why the heck is the only clever, brave woman a devil? And what about this angelic saintly Constance? I was so frustrated after reading this novel for the first time.

All movies are such lies. Why can't marry D'Artagnan and Constance? He even makes friends with Roquefort in the novel! But Lady de Winter is the devil, killing everyone without regret.

Would like to have a novel or book about her. And the "true story". Leah Angstman And as for the fourth Musketeer?

How about the fact that he posed as someone else to gain entry into a woman's bedchamber to have relations with her a And as for the fourth Musketeer?

How about the fact that he posed as someone else to gain entry into a woman's bedchamber to have relations with her after she'd refused him?

Apparently no big deal in this book? I found that maddening. Duke of Buckingham Logan Lerman D'Artagnan's Father Jane Perry D'Artagnan's Mother Mads Mikkelsen Every legend has a new beginning.

Edit Details Official Sites: Dolby Digital Datasat Dolby Surround 7. Edit Did You Know? The Legend of Fritton's Gold Goofs at around 1h 30 mins D'Artagnan's legs are throwing double shadows.

One to his rear, one to his front, revealing the studio location for this shot. There's one more piece of advice. I know, I know.

Don't get into any trouble. And remember, always, you're a Gascon and our son. Crazy Credits At the end of the movie, the first credits have a dedication,"For Bernd", referencing Bernd Eichinger, who died in January of He was producer of 4 of the Resident Evil films, also directed by Paul W.

Connections Referenced in Bad Movie Beatdown: Add the first question. Constance is sent ahead to quietly return the necklace to Queen Anne.

The musketeers arrive at the ball and, for the sake of King Louis and his people, lie by claiming that Rochefort tried to sabotage an airship that Richelieu built for them, and that they executed him for his treason on Richelieu's permission.

To convince the king, Athos presents Milady's authorization, which the former accepts. Richelieu, satisfied, offers the musketeers a place in his guards, but they refuse, and Richelieu vows revenge.

Meanwhile, Milady is found alive at the English Channel by Buckingham, who declares his intention to exact revenge. The camera then pulls back to show him advancing towards France with a massive fleet of battleships and airships.

Location filming was done in Bavaria with indoor shooting at Studio Babelsberg. It was filmed with an Arri Alexa camera.

The soundtrack was composed by Paul Haslinger. Deadline Hollywood reported that Summit responded with "She doesn't know what she's talking about and we don't know where she's coming from.

It's not the right way to behave. If she has a problem then come to the studio and talk about it". The film received negative reviews from critics, including criticism on the lack of originality, acting performances and outdated visual style.

The website's consensus is "It plays admirably fast and loose with Alexandre Dumas' classic tale, but in every other respect, The Three Musketeers offers nothing to recommend—or to set it apart from the many other film adaptations".

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. British Board of Film Classification. Retrieved 15 September Retrieved 21 November International Film Guide Retrieved 6 January Archived from the original on 16 October Retrieved 16 October

FILED UNDER : spiele im casino

TAG :

Comments

Submit a Comment

:*
:*